By Chris Savage
This is probably going to look like a commercial for the Calera company but I’ll say right off the bat that I have no connection or financial interest in them.
What I do have is a scientist’s interest in them.
Here’s a statistic that shocked me: cement manufacturing is responsible for 5% of global CO2 emissions and in the U.S., cement production represents 2.9% of overall energy usage.
What Calera has figured out how to do is use CO2 from factory emissions to make concrete. And here’s the amazing part:
Calera estimates that each cubic yard of its concrete would soak up more than 1,000 lb of CO2. In contrast, producing a cubic yard of traditional concrete generates more than 500 lb of CO2.
Most of the info in this blog entry is from a recent article in Chemical & Engineering News (Amer. Chem. Soc. membership req’d) called “Seeking To Cement A Green Future”. In the article the talk about several new cement manufacturing start-up companies that are aiming to make “green” cement and wallboard. But the part about Calera was what really caught my interest.
From the article:
To make cement, manufacturers heat limestone in a kiln to 2,650°F. The process eliminates chemically bound water molecules, releases CO2, and produces a marble-sized material called clinker, which is then ground to a fine powder. Gypsum is added, and the resulting cement is mixed with water, sand, and aggregates to produce concrete. The rehydration causes an exothermic chemical reaction that hardens the mix.Brent Constantz, Calera’s chief executive officer and an associate professor of geological and environmental sciences at Stanford University, plans to produce cement and aggregate that will enable the production of concrete with a negative CO2 footprint. In Calera’s process, CO2 from hot industrial flue gas is bubbled through mineral-rich seawater or hard water. Calcium and magnesium carbonates precipitate out of the solution and are transformed into two concrete ingredients: a synthetic limestone aggregate and an amorphous calcium carbonate with cementlike properties.
“Our process is akin to the skeletogenic process of corals and other marine organisms that precipitate carbonates from seawater,” Constantz says. Calera estimates that each cubic yard of its concrete would soak up more than 1,000 lb of CO2. In contrast, producing a cubic yard of traditional concrete generates more than 500 lb of CO2.
For the precipitation to occur, the solution must have a high pH. Depending on the water source, Constantz tells C&EN, the company can opt to use a proprietary, low-energy electrochemical process to add alkalinity. The full process is being tested at the company’s Moss Landing pilot plant near Monterey, Calif.
Will this eliminate all 5% of the CO2 generated from the manufacture of concrete? No. There are some conditions that must be met in order for a plant to be viable.
Given the mass-balance challenges of creating sufficient carbonates from flue gas and water, Constantz says Calera will have to carefully select its locations. The ideal site would include a power plant to supply CO2, a concrete ready-mix plant, and a water desalination plant. He says Calera’s wastewater, when stripped of its calcium and magnesium, could be inexpensively desalinated. And salt from the desalination could resupply Calera with raw material for the electrochemical plant.
So, of course not all cement can be made in this way. But, because of the negative carbon footprint of the process, every pound of concrete made using this process is the carbon equivalent of NOT making 2 pounds of cement in the conventional process. If one-third of all cement made used the Calera process, it would be the same as eliminating all CO2 emissions from current cement manufacturing. Put another way, founder of Calera, Brent Constantz, says “For every ton of cement we make, we are sequestering half a ton of CO2?.
It’s worth having a look at the video on Calera’s website. It features Carl Pope, the former Executive Director of the Sierra Club, speaking quite favorably about this exciting new technology.
heart of the Calera process is the technology associated with carbon capture and conversion to stable solid minerals. We refer to this new process as Carbon Mineralization via Aqueous Precipitation or CMAP for short. In its simplest form CMAP involves contacting gas from the power plant with water (aqueous) containing hardness and a base buffer (alkalinity). The water chemistry is controlled such that the carbon dioxide in the power plant gas is absorbed into the water and reacts with the water hardness to form solid mineral carbonates, which are very similar to fine limestone particles. These solid mineral carbonates now contain carbon dioxide that would have been emitted into the air. After removal from the water and appropriate processing the solids have value in a number of construction applications. The versatility of CMAP also allows the generation of bicarbonates using half the amount of input materials but still mineralizing carbon dioxide that can be pumped into any underground saline zone for storage without the possibility of leakage of carbon dioxide.
Click here to read the original article
more calera video
Brent Constantz Testimony: United States Senate Committee on Appropriations
Start Slide Show with PicLens Lite
Tags: calera, clean energy technology, cleantech
Is the emperor wearing any clothes?
The only important step is adding alkalinity to seawater. If you increase the alkalinity of the ocean it will automatically absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to form mainly bicarbonate. There is no need for the all the rest of this process.
You do not disclose the “low-energy electrochemical process to add alkalinity” but current cheapest technology for creating alkalinity uses virtually the same process as the one Calera are trying to displace; high temperature limestone calcination to give quicklime (and carbon dioxide). Sodium chloride electrolysis to give sodium hydroxide (and chlorine)is an option but hardly low energy.
Calera must have something else in mind. As a scientist have you any ideas what it might be?
> Calera must have something else in mind.
> As a scientist have you any ideas what
> it might be?
I do not know because, at this point, Calera’s process is proprietary. Maybe it is smoke and mirrors and maybe it is not. If it is, they have fooled a fairly large number of scientists and investors across the country. If it’s not, this is exciting stuff with the potential to have a big impact on carbon emissions in certain areas.
As you see from my essay, this isn’t something that can be done just anywhere. There are certain conditions that must be met and “ingredients” that need to be present. But in those cases (which aren’t unreasonable or unlikely) it can have a big impact.
Beyond this, I really can not say. As I say in my essay, I have no affiliation with this group and I know nothing more than what I have read on their website and in some of the linked articles. But I will say that these are exactly the kinds of game-changing innovations that we should be nurturing and encouraging in our country. I hope they are legit because I find it very exciting.
If only I had the resources to make a small investment… LOL!
Here is a reference to Calera’s alkalinity increasing technology.
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=CA&NR=2666147A1&KC=A1&FT=D&date=20100202&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_gb
I have not put a cost on it, indeed I am not sure they have supplied enough information to do that. The concept of raising pH only slightly, thus requiring only a small voltage is interesting and had certainly not occurred to me.
The electrolysis process Calera describe in their patent produces two moles of hydrochloric acid for every mole of carbon dioxide captured. Quoting from their website
“Q. What products does Calera produce?
A. The outputs from the Calera process are clean air, building materials (sand, aggregates, and/or supplementary cementitious products), fresh water, and excess carbonated water for re-injection. If the proprietary low voltage electrochemical process is required for additional alkalinity, hydrochloric acid will also be produced.
Q. What will happen to the hydrochloric acid?
A. The hydrochloric acid can be sold on the open market for industrial uses, used for oil well or brine production or be injected in deep geologic reservoirs”
As the lowest pH mentioned in table 1 of their patent
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=CA&NR=2666147A1&KC=A1&FT=D&date=20100202&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_gb
is 3.115 this hydrochloric acid is likely to be be very dilute, 0.000767 moles per litre based on 3.115. The volume of acidic liquid to be disposed of is therefore 59,235 cubic metres per tonne of captured carbon dioxide.